Speak up on Sarbanes-Oxley

As part of our new progressive, inclusive new politics we can turn to former enemy turned relevant free-market intellectual  Newt Gingrich, who has a well-reasoned op-ed piece in today’s San Francisco Chronicle.  In it, he calls for repealing Sarbanes-Oxley.  This will help the broad economy and is essential for Internet innovation to continue.

One unfortunate result of the enormous wealth created by the Internet era was that it made the Initial Public Offering synonymous with “getting rich”  as opposed to “raising growth capital.”  It was less than 8 years ago that we referred to IPOs as branding events.  In retrospect, this notion revealed how unsophisticated and foolish we were as an industry — investor and entrepreneur alike.  Read Facebook director and and Accel partner Jim Breyer’s interview to take a stroll down memory lane.

During the past 8 years or so, startups have had really one path to exit — the acquisition.   Very few companies — especially in the Internet industry — have been able or elected to go public.  This is the result of two economic tragedies.  First, was the demise of the IPO as method to raising less expensive growth capital.  The willing participants of our industry — venture investors, bankers, lawyers, and enterpreneurs looked the other way and handed out friends and family shares with impunity.  Second, the Enron collapse and the subsequent distruction of Arthur Andersen  tarnished the entire private sector.  Enron’s destruction was so swift and severe that their executives, Ken Lay, Jeff Skilling, and Andy Fastow became the latest in a long line of  nefarious, avaricious American corporate executives.

The reaction by congress which had the duel agenda of a placating constituents and damaging the Bush administration (Enron had close ties) was Sarbanes-Oxley.  As Gingrich points out, even with SarbOx,  Bear Stearns, AIG,  Lehman hit the wall.  Repealing this legislation costs the government nothing (in terms of “stimulus”) and can potentially create thousands of new jobs even in the next year.

As an industry, we need the IPO market to return.  Young companies need multiple paths to liquidity.  But we — especially managers — must resist the temptation (often pitched by bankers seeking fees and investors looking for exits) to go public too early.  Public companies need proven, growing, and reliable financial metrics in order to withstand the scrutiny of the public markets.

I believe the new administration can repeal or amend Sarbanes-Oxley in 2009 and companies should prepare for the changes.

Advertisements

3 Responses

  1. Hopefully changing Sarbanes-Oxley will change the way investors invest in new media startups, putting an emphasis back on revenue rather than eyeballs that can be acquired by Google, MSN, Yahoo or AOL… I’m all for it.

  2. Just sat in a panel with venture and p/e investors who were saying the same thing. Its costing their companies millions of dollars each year and for many of their portfolio companies this cost is prohibitive.

    Just as the Bush Doctrine was a misguided reaction to 9/11, Sarbanes-Oxley was an overreaction to Enron, Worldcom, Tyco, etc.

  3. […] 98/99 and has struggled and will struggle to come anywhere near that level of success.  Reminder: Sarbanes-Oxley is a big reason for the 05-07 […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: